Investigation Methodology

A structured, multi-phase process designed to produce verifiable procedural fairness at every stage.

Lead Auditor

Independent, credentialed professional conducting the investigation

Oversight Panel

Multi-perspective deliberative body providing independent review

Transparency Layer

Structured visibility ensuring appropriate stakeholder access

Investigation Phases

01

Case Intake & Classification

Cases are registered, classified by type and severity, and assigned scope parameters. Institutional consent is verified before proceeding.

Case IDTaxonomy classificationScope documentCooperation agreement
02

Preliminary Review

A review panel assesses the case to determine whether a full investigation is warranted. Stakeholder mapping and resource allocation occur at this stage.

Stakeholder mapResource assessmentTimeline frameworkAuthorization decision
03

Panel Assignment

Independent investigator and multi-panel structure are assembled. All members undergo conflict-of-interest screening with signed disclosures.

Lead investigatorProfessional panelCommunity panelAlumni panelCOI clearances
04

Evidence Collection

Systematic gathering of documentary, digital, financial, and testimonial evidence following federal chain-of-custody standards.

Evidence inventoryFinancial auditDigital recordsWitness list
05

Formal Interviews

Structured interviews following trauma-informed protocols. All parties receive support referrals. Transcripts are verified and sealed.

Interview transcriptsSupport referral recordsSealed testimony
06

Panel Deliberation

Each panel reviews evidence independently before cross-panel consensus review. Structured protocols prevent groupthink.

Panel assessmentsConsensus documentationMinority opinions
07

Final Determination

Formal findings report issued with recommendations and compliance requirements. All stakeholders receive appropriate-tier notifications.

Findings reportRecommendationsCompliance timelineStakeholder communications